From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rino Int'l Corp. Derivative Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jul 23, 2013
Lead Case No. 2:10-cv-02209- KJD -GWF (D. Nev. Jul. 23, 2013)

Opinion

Lead Case No. 2:10-cv-02209- KJD -GWF c/w case no. 2:10-cv-02244-KJD-DWF

07-23-2013

IN RE RINO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION DERIVATIVE LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS

John P. Aldrich, Esq. ALDRICH LAW FIRM, LTD Kip B. Shuman, Esq. Rusty E. Glenn, Esq. THE SHUMAN LAW FIRM


John P. Aldrich, Esq.
ALDRICH LAW FIRM, LTD
Kip B. Shuman, Esq.
Rusty E. Glenn, Esq.
THE SHUMAN LAW FIRM

FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT

This matter came before the Court for hearing pursuant to the Court's Order Preliminarily Approving Derivative Settlement and Providing for Notice, dated April 30, 2013 (the "Preliminary Approval Order"), on the application of the Parties for final approval of the settlement set forth in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement dated November 28, 2012 (the "Stipulation"). Due and adequate notice having been given to Current RINO Shareholders as required in said Preliminary Approval Order, and the Court having considered all papers filed and proceedings had herein and otherwise being fully informed in the premises and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:

1. This Final Order and Judgment incorporates by reference the definitions in the Stipulation, and all capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Stipulation.

2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Nevada Federal Action, including all matters necessary to effectuate the Settlement, and over all Parties.

3. The Court finds that the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation is fair, reasonable, and adequate as to each of the Parties, and hereby finally approves the Settlement in all respects, finds that the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation provides substantial benefits to RINO and Current RINO Shareholders, and orders the Parties to perform its terms to the extent the Parties have not already done so.

4. The Nevada Federal Action, all claims contained therein, and Plaintiffs' Released Claims are hereby ordered as compromised, settled, released, discharged and dismissed on the merits and with prejudice by virtue of the proceedings herein and this Final Order and Judgment. As among Plaintiffs, RINO, and the Individual Defendants, the Parties are to bear their own costs, except as otherwise provided in the Stipulation.

5. Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs' Released Persons, and Current RINO Shareholders are forever enjoined and permanently barred from instituting, commencing or prosecuting against Defendants and/or Defendants' Released Persons any of Plaintiffs' Released Claims and as well as any claims arising out of, relating to or in connection with the institution, prosecution, assertion, defense, settlement, or resolution of the Nevada Federal Action,

6. Defendants and Defendants' Released Persons are forever enjoined and permanently barred from instituting, commencing or prosecuting against Plaintiffs and/or Plaintiffs' Released Persons any of Defendants' Released Claims as well as any claims arising out of, relating to, or in connection with the institution, prosecution, assertion, defense, settlement, or resolution of the Nevada Federal Action.

7. Upon the Effective Date, Plaintiffs' Released Persons, RINO, and each of RINO's shareholders (solely in their capacity as RINO shareholders), including the California Federal Plaintiffs, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Final Order and Judgment shall have, fully, finally and forever released, relinquished and discharged as against Defendants' Released Persons any and all of Plaintiffs' Released Claims, and each of Plaintiffs' Released Persons, RINO, and each of RINO's shareholders (solely in their capacity as RINO shareholders) shall forever be barred and enjoined from instituting, commencing, or prosecuting any and all of Plaintiffs' Released Claims against any of Defendants' Released Persons.

8. Upon the Effective Date, Defendants' Released Persons shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, fully, finally and forever released, relinquished and discharged as against Plaintiffs' Released Persons, RINO, and all of RINO's shareholders (solely in their capacity as RINO shareholders) any and all of Defendants' Released Claims, and Defendants' Released Persons shall forever be barred and enjoined from instituting, commencing, or prosecuting any and all of Defendants' Released Claims against any of Plaintiffs' Released Persons, RINO, or any of RINO's shareholders (solely in their capacity as RINO shareholders).

9. The Court finds that the Notice to Current RINO Shareholders, published in the Jnvestor's Business Daily, provided the best notice practicable under the circumstances of these proceedings and of the matters set forth therein, including the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation, to all Persons entitled to such notice, and said Notice fully satisfied the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.1 and the requirements of due process.

10. Within ten (10) business days following the entry of this Final Order and Judgment, the Parties will jointly apply to have the California State Action and Nevada State Action dismissed with prejudice.

11. The Court finds that during the course of the Nevada Federal Action, the Parties and their counsel at all times complied with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11.

12. The Court finds that the Fee Award and Incentive Awards are fair and reasonable, in accordance with the Stipulation, and finally approves the Fee Award and Incentive Awards.

13. Neither the Stipulation (including any exhibits attached hereto) nor the Settlement, nor any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of the Stipulation or the Settlement: (i) is or may be deemed to be or may be offered, attempted to be offered or used in any way by the Parties as a presumption, a concession or an admission of, or evidence of, the validity of any of Plaintiffs' Released Claims, or of any fault, wrongdoing or liability of any of the Parties, Plaintiffs' Counsel, Defendants' Counsel, Defendants' Released Persons or Plaintiffs' Released Persons; or (ii) is or may be deemed to be or may be offered, attempted to be offered or used in any way by the Parties as a presumption, a concession or an admission of, or evidence of, any fault, omission, wrongdoing or liability of any of the Parties, Plaintiffs' Counsel, Defendants' Counsel, Defendants' Released Persons or Plaintiffs' Released Persons in any civil, criminal, or administrative proceeding in any court, administrative agency, or other tribunal. The Parties, Plaintiffs' Counsel, Defendants' Counsel, Defendants' Released Persons and Plaintiffs' Released Persons may file the Stipulation and/or the Final Order and Judgment in any action that has been or may be brought against them (including but not limited to the California Federal Action) in order to support a defense or counterclaim based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, good-faith settlement, judgment bar or reduction, or any other theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim.

14. Without affecting the finality of this Final Order and Judgment in any way, this Court hereby retains continuing jurisdiction over: (a) implementation of the Settlement; and (b) the Parties for the purpose of construing, enforcing, and administering the Stipulation, including, if necessary, setting aside and vacating this Final Order and Judgment, on motion of a Party, to the extent consistent with and in accordance with the Stipulation if the Effective Date fails to occur in accordance with the Stipulation.

15. This Final Order and Judgment is a final, appealable judgment and should be entered forthwith by the Clerk in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

HONORABLE KENT J. DAWSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

In re Rino Int'l Corp. Derivative Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jul 23, 2013
Lead Case No. 2:10-cv-02209- KJD -GWF (D. Nev. Jul. 23, 2013)
Case details for

In re Rino Int'l Corp. Derivative Litig.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE RINO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION DERIVATIVE LITIGATION This Document…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jul 23, 2013

Citations

Lead Case No. 2:10-cv-02209- KJD -GWF (D. Nev. Jul. 23, 2013)