From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Apr 19, 2005
Master File 00 Civ. 2843 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 19, 2005)

Opinion

Master File 00 Civ. 2843 (LAK).

April 19, 2005

RON M. FEDER (MSB #5166), Attorney for plaintiff.

WHITMAN B. JOHNSON III (MSB # 3158), Attorney for defendant Joe M. Ross, M.D.


AGREED JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE


THIS CAUSE having come before the Court this day on joint motion of the plaintiff, Mary Davis, and defendant Joe M. Ross, M.D. (referred to in the Complaint as Joe R. Ross, M.D.), and it having been made known to the Court that the plaintiff is desirous of dismissing her Complaint against Dr. Ross with prejudice, the Court finds that said motion is well taken and should be granted.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the above-styled and numbered cause be and it is hereby dismissed as to all claims against Joe M. Ross, M.D. (referred to in the Complaint as Joe R. Ross, M.D.). The Court further finds that pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, there is no just reason to delay entry of a final judgment and hereby directs the Clerk to enter final judgment in favor of Dr. Ross. All other claims against all other parties remain outstanding.

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.


Summaries of

In re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Apr 19, 2005
Master File 00 Civ. 2843 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 19, 2005)
Case details for

In re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation

Case Details

Full title:In re: REZULIN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (MDL No. 1348). This document…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Apr 19, 2005

Citations

Master File 00 Civ. 2843 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 19, 2005)