From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 3, 2005
Master File 00 Civ. 2843 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 3, 2005)

Opinion

Master File 00 Civ. 2843 (LAK).

March 3, 2005

GIRARDI KEESE, THOMAS V. GIRARDI, DAVID N. BIGELOW, VINCENT J. CARTER, RYAN M. McNAMARA, Los Angeles, California, Attorneys for Plaintiff(s).

KAYE SCHOLER, PAUL GELB, Attorneys for Warner-Lambert Co.

REED SMITH, LLP, ERIC MORRISON, Attorneys for Jerrold Olefsky.

COTKINS, COLLINS GINSBURG, KEVIN A. DUFFIS, Attorneys for George Kimmerling, M.D.


STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER THEREON


IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 41(a)(1).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 3, 2005
Master File 00 Civ. 2843 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 3, 2005)
Case details for

In re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: REZULIN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (MDL No. 1348). Document…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 3, 2005

Citations

Master File 00 Civ. 2843 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 3, 2005)