From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 1, 2004
00 Civ. 2843 (LAK), 02 Civ. 5781, 02 Civ. 8380, 02 Civ. 8383, 02 Civ. 8390, 03 Civ. 6388 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 1, 2004)

Opinion

00 Civ. 2843 (LAK), 02 Civ. 5781, 02 Civ. 8380, 02 Civ. 8383, 02 Civ. 8390, 03 Civ. 6388.

November 1, 2004

Edward Blackmon, Jr., Esq., Attorney of Record for Plaintiffs.

Chris J. Walker, Esq., Peter J. Markow, Jr., Esq., R. Niles Hooper, Esq., Attorneys for Defendants.


ORDER


THIS CAUSE came on to be heard upon the ore tenus motion of the Plaintiffs, who move this Court to dismiss with prejudice the claims against the Defendants, Danny W. Jackson, D.O., James D. Polk, M.D., and Mark E. Wilson, M.D. and the entry of a final judgment as to said Defendants. The Court, having considered the motion, noting the agreement of counsel for Plaintiffs and said Defendants, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, finds that the motion is well taken and should be granted.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Complaint and all claims filed therein by the Plaintiffs against the Defendants, Danny W. Jackson, D.O., James D. Polk, M.D., and Mark E. Wilson, M.D., shall be and hereby are dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other claims of the Plaintiffs against the other Defendants named in this civil action are hereby reserved as stated in the Complaint and will proceed accordingly.

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

ORDER

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard upon the ore tenus motion of the Plaintiffs, who move this Court to dismiss with prejudice the claims against the Defendants, Gary D. Holdiness, M.D., referred to in the Complaint as Gary Donald Holdiness, M.D. and the entry of a final judgment as to said Defendants. The Court, having considered the motion, noting the agreement of counsel for Plaintiffs and said Defendants, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, finds that the motion is well taken and should be granted.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Complaint and all claims filed therein by the Plaintiffs against the Defendant, Gary D. Holdiness, M.D., referred to in the Complaint as Gary Donald Holdiness, M.D., shall be and hereby are dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other claims of the Plaintiffs against the other Defendants named in this civil action are hereby reserved as stated in the Complaint and will proceed accordingly.

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

ORDER

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard upon the ore tenus motion of the Plaintiffs, who move this Court to dismiss with prejudice the claims against the Defendant, Benjamin L. Hammack, M.D. and the entry of a final judgment as to said Defendants. The Court, having considered the motion, noting the agreement of counsel for Plaintiffs and said Defendants, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, finds that the motion is well taken and should be granted.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Complaint and all claims filed therein by the Plaintiffs against the Defendant, Benjamin L. Hammack, M.D. shall be and hereby are dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other claims of the Plaintiffs against the other Defendants named in this civil action are hereby reserved as stated in the Complaint and will proceed accordingly.

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

ORDER

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard upon the ore tenus motion of the Plaintiffs, who move this Court to dismiss with prejudice the claims against the Defendant, Jerry W. Iles, M.D. and the entry of a final judgment as to said Defendants. The Court, having considered the motion, noting the agreement of counsel for Plaintiffs and said Defendants, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, finds that the motion is well taken and should be granted.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Complaint and all claims filed therein by the Plaintiffs against the Defendant, Jerry W. Iles, M.D., shall be and hereby are dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other claims of the Plaintiffs against the other Defendants named in this civil action are hereby reserved as stated in the Complaint and will proceed accordingly.

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

ORDER

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard upon the ore tenus motion of the Plaintiffs, who move this Court to dismiss with prejudice the claims against the Defendant, Ben F. Sanford, Jr., M.D., referred to in the Complaint as Ben Sanford, M.D. and the entry of a final judgment as to said Defendants. The Court, having considered the motion, noting the agreement of counsel for Plaintiffs and said Defendants, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, finds that the motion is well taken and should be granted.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Complaint and all claims filed therein by the Plaintiffs against the Defendant, Ben F. Sanford, Jr., M.D., referred to in the Complaint as Ben Sanford, M.D., shall be and hereby are dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other claims of the Plaintiffs against the other Defendants named in this civil action are hereby reserved as stated in the Complaint and will proceed accordingly.

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.


Summaries of

In re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 1, 2004
00 Civ. 2843 (LAK), 02 Civ. 5781, 02 Civ. 8380, 02 Civ. 8383, 02 Civ. 8390, 03 Civ. 6388 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 1, 2004)
Case details for

In re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation

Case Details

Full title:In re: REZULIN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (MDL No. 1348). Henry…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 1, 2004

Citations

00 Civ. 2843 (LAK), 02 Civ. 5781, 02 Civ. 8380, 02 Civ. 8383, 02 Civ. 8390, 03 Civ. 6388 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 1, 2004)

Citing Cases

Moore v. Churchwell

wise, but included general references to the Master to ascertain the amount due one party or the other…

Brewing Corp. of A. v. Pioneer Distr. Co.

In the decree from which this appeal was taken, the Chancellor held that the defendant was liable as a matter…