From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Feb 1, 2005
Master File 00cv2843 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 1, 2005)

Opinion

Master File 00cv2843 (LAK).

February 1, 2005

HOLLIS WRIGHT, PC, Josh Wright, Birmingham, Alabama, Attorneys for Era Denson.

BRADLEY ARANT ROSE WHITE, Andrew B. Johnson, Birmingham, Alabama, and KAYE SCHOLER LLP, New York, New York, Attorneys for Defendants Warner-Lambert Company and Parke-Davis, an unincoporated division of Warner-Lambert.


STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE


IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT:

1. All claims by plaintiff Era Denson are dismissed with prejudice as to all defendants in this action.
2. There are no motions pending in this matter. When approved, this Stipulation of Dismissal will close this case in its entirety.
3. Each party shall bear its own cost and attorneys' fees.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Feb 1, 2005
Master File 00cv2843 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 1, 2005)
Case details for

In re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation

Case Details

Full title:In re: REZULIN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (MDL No. 1348). This Document…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Feb 1, 2005

Citations

Master File 00cv2843 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 1, 2005)