From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 28, 2005
Master File 00 Civ. 2843 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 28, 2005)

Opinion

Master File 00 Civ. 2843 (LAK).

July 28, 2005

GIRARDI/KEESE, THOMAS V. GIRARDI, DAVID N. BIGELOW, VINCENT J. CARTER, RYAN M. McNAMARA, Los Angeles, California, Attorneys for Plaintiff(s).

CARROLL, KELLY, TROTTER, FRANZEN McKENNA, BRENDA LIGORSKY, Attorneys for Defendants, EDWARD DOMURAT, JR., M.D., RAJ BANKA, M.D., ROBERT JAMES DUDL, M.D., ARNOLD BERMAN, M.D., DANIEL CROGAN, M.D., KAREN OU-YANG, M.D., EDWARD HESS, M.D., RANDALL TAN, M.D., EDWARD HATTLER, M.D., PATRICIA VAN NORDSTROM, M.D., CRAIG SMITH, M.D., MONICA CURRIE-JOHNSON, M.D., LOLLIE SCHIFFMAN, M.D., AMIR BUDAYR, M.D., ALAN PLUTCHOK, M.D., GELEIBTER, M.D.


STIPULATION OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL AND ORDER THEREON


IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice as to defendant, EDWARD DOMURAT, JR., M.D., only, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 41(a)(1). IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice as to defendant, RAJ BANKA, M.D., only, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 41(a)(1). IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice as to defendant, ROBERT JAMES DUDL, M.D., only, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 41(a)(1). IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice as to defendant, ARNOLD BERMAN, M.D., only, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 41(a)(1). IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice as to defendant, DANIEL CROGAN, M.D., only, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 41(a)(1). IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice as to defendant, KAREN OU-YANG, M.D., only, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 41(a)(1). IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice as to defendant, EDWARD HESS, M.D., only, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 41(a)(1). IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice as to defendant, RANDALL TAN, M.D., only, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 41(a)(1). IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice as to defendant, EDWARD HATTLER, M.D., only, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 41(a)(1). IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice as to defendant, PATRICIA VAN NORDSTROM, M.D., only, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 41(a)(1). IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice as to defendant, CRAIG SMITH, M.D., only, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 41(a)(1). IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice as to defendant, MONICA CURRIE-JOHNSON, M.D., only, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 41(a)(1). IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice as to defendant, LOLLIE SCHIFFMAN, M.D., only, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 41(a)(1). IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice as to defendant, AMIR BUDAYR, M.D., only, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 41(a)(1). IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice as to defendant, ALAN PLUTCHOK, M.D., only, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 41(a)(1). IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice as to defendant, MARK GELIEBTER, M.D., only, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 41(a)(1).

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 28, 2005
Master File 00 Civ. 2843 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 28, 2005)
Case details for

In re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: REZULIN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (MDL No. 1348). Document…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 28, 2005

Citations

Master File 00 Civ. 2843 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 28, 2005)