From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Resnick

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Oct 15, 2014
219 N.J. 620 (N.J. 2014)

Opinion

10-15-2014

In the Matter of Michael L. RESNICK, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 005771988).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13–413, concluding that MICHAEL L. RESNICK of LONG VALLEY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1988, should be censured for violating RPC 1.7(a)(2) (conflict of interest), RPC 1.16(d) (failure to protect a client's interests on termination of the representation), RPC 3.5(b) (ex parte communication with a judge), and RPC 8.4(a) (violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct );

And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that a reprimand is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent's unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MICHAEL L. RESNICK is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Resnick

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Oct 15, 2014
219 N.J. 620 (N.J. 2014)
Case details for

In re Resnick

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Michael L. RESNICK, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Oct 15, 2014

Citations

219 N.J. 620 (N.J. 2014)
99 A.3d 827

Citing Cases

In re Vazquez

In re Carroll, 232 N.J. 111 (2018) (public defender violated RPC 1.7(a)(2) by engaging in a sexual…

In re Resnick

In all, he violated RPC 1.7(a)(2), RPC 1.16(d), RPC 3.5(b), and RPC 8.4(a). In re Resnick, 219 N.J. 620…