From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re R.B.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jan 24, 2022
No. 05-21-01063-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 24, 2022)

Opinion

05-21-01063-CV

01-24-2022

IN RE R.B., Relator


Original Proceeding from the 330th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-13-20408-Y

Before Justices Myers, Partida-Kipness, and Carlyle

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PARTIDA-KIPNESS JUSTICE

In this original proceeding, relator asks this Court for a writ of mandamus compelling the trial court to vacate its temporary order changing the conservator with the exclusive right to determine the child's primary residence. We deny the petition on the merits, and we deny the motion for temporary relief and emergency stay as moot.

Relator first filed a petition in this case in which she failed to redact information that identified her minor child. By order dated December 15, 2021, we struck the petition and supporting appendix, and we granted relator leave to file a redacted petition in compliance with rule 9.9 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.9. Relator's refiled petition includes some redactions, but still contains sensitive information that identifies her minor child. In the interest of judicial economy, we exercise our discretion to consider the merits of her petition before striking it again.

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that she lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on our review of the record, we conclude relator has failed to show her entitlement to the relief requested. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus on the merits, and we deny the motion for temporary relief and emergency stay as moot.

We also strike the petition and supporting appendix for relator's failure to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.9's redaction requirements.

JUDGMENT

In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, the trial court's order denying the motion to dismiss of Methodist Hospitals of Dallas d/b/a Methodist Mansfield Medical Center is AFFIRMED.

It is ORDERED that appellee CYNTHIA YATES, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF HUBERT YATES recover her costs of this appeal from appellant METHODIST HOSPITALS OF DALLAS D/B/A METHODIST MANSFIELD MEDICAL CENTER.


Summaries of

In re R.B.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jan 24, 2022
No. 05-21-01063-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 24, 2022)
Case details for

In re R.B.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE R.B., Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Jan 24, 2022

Citations

No. 05-21-01063-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 24, 2022)