From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rausch

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Apr 21, 2016
134 A.3d 25 (N.J. 2016)

Opinion

04-21-2016

In the Matter of Michael P. RAUSCH, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 053241994).


CORRECTED ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 15–176, concluding that MICHAEL P. RAUSCH of HADDONFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1994, should be censured for violating RPC 8.4(b) (committing a criminal act that reflects adversely on a lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer), and RPC 8.4(d) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice);

And the Court this date having granted respondent's petition for review (R–4–15) in this matter, and having determined that the formal complaint filed in District Docket No. XIV–2010–0373E should be dismissed;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the formal complaint in District Docket No. XIV–2010–0373E against MICHAEL P. RAUSCH is hereby dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Rausch

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Apr 21, 2016
134 A.3d 25 (N.J. 2016)
Case details for

In re Rausch

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Michael P. RAUSCH, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Apr 21, 2016

Citations

134 A.3d 25 (N.J. 2016)
224 N.J. 444

Citing Cases

In re Pagliara

On subsequent review, the Court dismissed the ethics complaint against Rausch. In re Rausch, 224 N.J. 444…

In re Hyderally

The Court dismissed the matter. In re Rausch, 224 N.J. 444 (2016). In In re Buckley, 226 N.J. 478 (2016), the…