From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rasheed

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Dec 20, 2019
No. 05-19-01556-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 20, 2019)

Opinion

No. 05-19-01556-CV

12-20-2019

IN RE HAROON RASHEED, SOLAR HEALTH P.A., HRMD MANAGEMENT LLC, TEXAS PAIN PHYSICIANS AND INTEGRATED HOSPITAL SPECIALISTS, Relators


Original Proceeding from the 95th District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-04492

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Myers, Schenck, and Reichek
Opinion by Justice Reichek

Before the Court is relators' December 19, 2019 petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to vacate the trial court's order granting a continuance on relators' no-evidence motion for summary judgment.

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show both that a trial judge has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition and the mandamus record, as well as the response, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested.

Accordingly, we deny relators' petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

/Amanda L. Reichek/

AMANDA L. REICHEK

JUSTICE 191556F.P06


Summaries of

In re Rasheed

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Dec 20, 2019
No. 05-19-01556-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 20, 2019)
Case details for

In re Rasheed

Case Details

Full title:IN RE HAROON RASHEED, SOLAR HEALTH P.A., HRMD MANAGEMENT LLC, TEXAS PAIN…

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Dec 20, 2019

Citations

No. 05-19-01556-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 20, 2019)