From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re R.A.Q.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jul 31, 2012
NO. 03-11-00432-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 31, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 03-11-00432-CV

07-31-2012

In the Interest of R. A. Q.


FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

NO. 09-3302-FC1, HONORABLE TAMARA ARRINGTON, JUDGE PRESIDING


MEMORANDUM OPINION

John Quaak has failed to prosecute his appeal. After requesting and receiving two extensions of time to file it, appellant's brief was due March 1, 2012. On May 29, 2012, this Court's clerk sent Quaak a notice informing him that his brief was overdue and cautioned that his appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution unless Quaak filed a response reasonably explaining his failure to file a brief. That response was due by June 8, 2012. Quaak has not responded to the notice, nor has he filed a brief. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justices Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin Dismissed for Want of Prosecution


Summaries of

In re R.A.Q.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jul 31, 2012
NO. 03-11-00432-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 31, 2012)
Case details for

In re R.A.Q.

Case Details

Full title:In the Interest of R. A. Q.

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Jul 31, 2012

Citations

NO. 03-11-00432-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 31, 2012)