From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Purdue Pharma Bankr.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 3, 2021
21 cv 7969 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 3, 2021)

Opinion

21 cv 7532 (CM) [Rel: 21 cv 7585 (CM) 21 cv 7961 (CM) 21 cv 7962 (CM) 21 cv 7966 (CM) 21 cv 7969 (CM) 21 cv 8034 (CM) 21 cv 8042 (CM) 21 cv 8049 (CM) 21 cv 8055 (CM) 21 cv 8139 (CM) 21 cv 8258 (CM) 21 cv 8271 (CM)]

12-03-2021

In re: PURDUE PHARMA BANKRUPTCY APPEALS This Filing Relates to ALL MATTERS


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

MCMAHON, J.:

Pro se appellant Ellen Isaacs, on Behalf of Patrick Ryan Wroblewski, filed a motion for sanctions against Davis Polk, dated November 25, 2021, seeking $17 billion in sanctions. (Dkt. No. 216). Davis Polk filed a response to this motion on November 30, 2021. (Dkt. No. 232).

For the reasons set forth in the Debtors' response (KZ), the Court agrees that the motion is meritless and should be DENIED.

The Clerk is directed to close the motion at Docket Number 216.

BY ECF TO ALL PARTIES


Summaries of

In re Purdue Pharma Bankr.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 3, 2021
21 cv 7969 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 3, 2021)
Case details for

In re Purdue Pharma Bankr.

Case Details

Full title:In re: PURDUE PHARMA BANKRUPTCY APPEALS This Filing Relates to ALL MATTERS

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 3, 2021

Citations

21 cv 7969 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 3, 2021)