From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Pridham

California Supreme Court(Minute Order)
Dec 20, 2021
No. S271425 (Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)

Opinion

S271425

12-20-2021

PRIDHAM ON DISCIPLINE


Recommended discipline imposed

The court orders that GRENVILLE THOMAS PRIDHAM (Respondent), State Bar Number 120695, is suspended from the practice of law in California for two years, execution of that period of suspension is stayed, and Respondent is placed on probation for two years subject to the following conditions:

1. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for the first 60 days of probation;
2. Respondent must comply with the other conditions of probation recommended by the Hearing Department of the State Bar Court in its Decision filed on September 13, 2021; and
3. At the expiration of the period of probation, if Respondent has complied with all conditions of probation, the period of stayed suspension will be satisfied and that suspension will be terminated.

Respondent must provide to the State Bar's Office of Probation proof of taking and passing the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination as recommended by the Hearing Department in its Decision filed on September 13, 2021. Failure to do so may result in suspension. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.10(b).)

Costs are awarded to the State Bar in accordance with Business and Professions Code section 6086.10 and are enforceable both as provided in Business and Professions Code section 6140.7 and as a money judgment, and may be collected by the State Bar through any means permitted by law.


Summaries of

In re Pridham

California Supreme Court(Minute Order)
Dec 20, 2021
No. S271425 (Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)
Case details for

In re Pridham

Case Details

Full title:PRIDHAM ON DISCIPLINE

Court:California Supreme Court(Minute Order)

Date published: Dec 20, 2021

Citations

No. S271425 (Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)