From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Prempro

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
Dec 9, 2011
4:03-CV-001507-BRW (E.D. Ark. Dec. 9, 2011)

Opinion

4:03-CV-001507-BRW

12-09-2011

In re Prempro, Defendants' Motion for Revision of Schedule Re: Daubert Challenge Concerning Short-Term Use and Lobular Cancer


RICHARD SHEPPARD ARNOLD UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE

Mr. F. Lane Heard , III

Williams & Connolly

725 Twelfth Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20005-5901
Dear Mr. Heard: The following appears in my September 7, 2011 Order:

Please note well the schedule set forth above because I am going to be disinclined to grant extensions. In other words, don't count on extensions even though I have granted them in the past without much fuss. You are hereby advised in the premises.
Please explain why the requested extension is necessary. Do not be optimistic.

Doc. No. 2792.

Cordially,

Billy Roy Wilson

Original to the Clerk of the Court

cc: Other Counsel of Record


Summaries of

In re Prempro

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
Dec 9, 2011
4:03-CV-001507-BRW (E.D. Ark. Dec. 9, 2011)
Case details for

In re Prempro

Case Details

Full title:In re Prempro, Defendants' Motion for Revision of Schedule Re: Daubert…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

Date published: Dec 9, 2011

Citations

4:03-CV-001507-BRW (E.D. Ark. Dec. 9, 2011)