From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Post Meds Data Breach Litig.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 13, 2024
4:23-cv-05710-HSG (N.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2024)

Opinion

4:23-cv-05710-HSG

02-13-2024

IN RE POST MEDS, INC. DATA BREACH LITIGATION

Gary M. Klinger (admitted pro hac vice) MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN, PLLC Attorneys for Plaintiffs Richard Reed, and the Proposed Class Proposed Co-Lead Counsel John J. Nelson (SBN 317598) MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN, PLLC Attorneys for Plaintiffs Additional Counsel on Signature Pages BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP Marcus McCutcheon Casie D. Collignon Attorneys for Defendant Postmeds, Inc. dba Truepill HAUSFELD, LLC James J. Pizzirusso Steven M. Nathan Attorneys for Plaintiff Linda Johnson, and the Proposed Class Proposed Co-Lead Counsel PEARSON WARSHAW LLP Jill M. Manning Attorneys for Plaintiff Linda Johnson, and the Proposed Class Proposed Liaison Counsel SIRI & GLIMSTAD LLP Kyle McLean Mason A. Barney Tyler J. Bean Attorneys for Plaintiffs John Rossi, Michael Thomas, Marissa Porter, and the Proposed Class COLE & VAN NOTE Laura Grace Van Note Elizabeth Ruth Klos Attorneys for Plaintiffs Benjamin Fisher, Brittany Hallman, and the Proposed Class LAUKAITIS LAW LLC Kevin Laukaitis Attorneys for Plaintiffs Benjamin Fisher, Brittany Hallman, and the Proposed Class TURKE & STRAUSS LLP Samuel J. Strauss Raina Borrelli Attorneys for Plaintiffs David MacDonald, and the Proposed Class LAW OFFICES OF RONALD A. MARRON Ronald A. Marron Alexis M. Wood Kas L. Gallucci Attorneys for Plaintiffs Christopher Williams, and the Proposed Class SROURIAN LAW FIRM, P.C Daniel Srourian Attorneys for Plaintiff Lasedrick Toles, and the Proposed Class KOPELOWITZ OSTROW P.A. Kristen Lake Cardoso Attorneys for Plaintiff Angela Morgan, and the Proposed Class PEARSON WARSHAW, LLP Daniel L. Warshaw Neil J. Swartzberg Attorneys for Plaintiff Linda Johnson, and the Proposed Class KIESEL LAW LLP Jeffrey A. Koncius Nicole Ramirez Jones Attorneys for Plaintiff Linda Johnson, and the Proposed Class BARRACK, RODOS & BACINE Samuel M. Ward Stephen R. Basser Attorneys for Plaintiff Russell Autry, Jacob Benjamin, Victoria Phillips, and the Proposed Class EMERSON FIRM, PLLC John G. Emerson Attorneys for Plaintiffs Russell Autry, Jacob Benjamin, Victoria Phillips, and the Proposed Class POULIN WILLEY ANASTOPOULO, LLC Eric M. Poulin Blake G. Abbott Paul J. Doolittle Attorneys for Plaintiff Callie Adams, and The Proposed Class BOHREN LAW, APC John Christian Bohren Attorneys for Plaintiff Callie Adams, and The Proposed Class CHESTNUT CAMBRONE PA Bryan L. Bleichner Attorneys for Plaintiff Meliza Moran and the Putative Class POTTER HANDY LLP James M. Treglio Mark D. Potter Attorneys for Plaintiffs Daniel Cohen, Mayra Mendez, and the Proposed Class SCHUBERT JONCKHEER & KOLBE LLP Amber L. Schubert Robert C. Schubert Dustin L. Schubert Attorneys for Plaintiffs Charles Byrd, Vanessa Wilson, and the Proposed Class


Gary M. Klinger (admitted pro hac vice)

MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN, PLLC

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Richard Reed, and the Proposed Class Proposed Co-Lead Counsel

John J. Nelson (SBN 317598)

MILBERG COLEMAN BRYSON PHILLIPS GROSSMAN, PLLC

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Additional Counsel on Signature Pages

BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP

Marcus McCutcheon Casie D. Collignon

Attorneys for Defendant Postmeds, Inc. dba Truepill

HAUSFELD, LLC

James J. Pizzirusso

Steven M. Nathan

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Linda Johnson, and the Proposed Class Proposed Co-Lead Counsel

PEARSON WARSHAW LLP

Jill M. Manning

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Linda Johnson, and the Proposed Class Proposed Liaison Counsel

SIRI & GLIMSTAD LLP

Kyle McLean

Mason A. Barney

Tyler J. Bean

Attorneys for Plaintiffs John Rossi, Michael Thomas, Marissa Porter, and the Proposed Class

COLE & VAN NOTE

Laura Grace Van Note

Elizabeth Ruth Klos

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Benjamin Fisher, Brittany Hallman, and the Proposed Class

LAUKAITIS LAW LLC

Kevin Laukaitis

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Benjamin Fisher, Brittany Hallman, and the Proposed Class

TURKE & STRAUSS LLP

Samuel J. Strauss

Raina Borrelli

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

David MacDonald, and the Proposed Class

LAW OFFICES OF RONALD A. MARRON

Ronald A. Marron

Alexis M. Wood

Kas L. Gallucci

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Christopher Williams, and the Proposed Class

SROURIAN LAW FIRM, P.C

Daniel Srourian

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Lasedrick Toles, and the Proposed Class

KOPELOWITZ OSTROW P.A.

Kristen Lake Cardoso

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Angela Morgan, and the Proposed Class

PEARSON WARSHAW, LLP

Daniel L. Warshaw

Neil J. Swartzberg

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Linda Johnson, and the Proposed Class

KIESEL LAW LLP

Jeffrey A. Koncius

Nicole Ramirez Jones

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Linda Johnson, and the Proposed Class

BARRACK, RODOS & BACINE

Samuel M. Ward

Stephen R. Basser

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Russell Autry, Jacob Benjamin, Victoria Phillips, and the Proposed Class

EMERSON FIRM, PLLC

John G. Emerson

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Russell Autry, Jacob Benjamin, Victoria Phillips, and the Proposed Class

POULIN WILLEY ANASTOPOULO, LLC

Eric M. Poulin

Blake G. Abbott

Paul J. Doolittle

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Callie Adams, and The Proposed Class

BOHREN LAW, APC

John Christian Bohren

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Callie Adams, and The Proposed Class

CHESTNUT CAMBRONE PA

Bryan L. Bleichner

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Meliza Moran and the Putative Class

POTTER HANDY LLP

James M. Treglio

Mark D. Potter

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Daniel Cohen, Mayra Mendez, and the Proposed Class

SCHUBERT JONCKHEER & KOLBE LLP

Amber L. Schubert

Robert C. Schubert

Dustin L. Schubert

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Charles Byrd, Vanessa Wilson, and the Proposed Class

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

[ ] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
[ ] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
[ ] Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge (ADR L.R. 7)
[x] Private ADR (specify process and provider)
Mediation scheduled with Jill R. Sperber, Esq. of Judicate West

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

[ ] the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR)
[x] other requested deadline: May 3, 2024

ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I, Gary M. Klinger, hereby certify that I have obtained the concurrence in the filing of this document from all signatories listed above. I further attest that I have on file records to support this concurrence for subsequent production to the Court if so ordered of for inspection upon request.

ORDER

[x] IT IS SO ORDERED.

[ ] IT IS SO ORDERED WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS:


Summaries of

In re Post Meds Data Breach Litig.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 13, 2024
4:23-cv-05710-HSG (N.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2024)
Case details for

In re Post Meds Data Breach Litig.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE POST MEDS, INC. DATA BREACH LITIGATION

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 13, 2024

Citations

4:23-cv-05710-HSG (N.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2024)