Opinion
Supreme Court No. SB-08-0151-D
March 17, 2009.
Disciplinary Commission Nos. 06-1089, 06-1488, 07-0256.
ORDER
The Court has received the "State Bar Statement of Costs and Expenses." Respondent Patrick A. Plummer filed an "Objection to Costs Petition for Review Under Arizona Supreme Court Rule 60 (b)(1)" and a number of motions. On December 31, 2008, the Court entered an Order denying Respondent's motions and submitting the matter of costs to the Court. Respondent then filed a "Petition for Review of SBA Costs Under Supreme Court Rule 23," and a "Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order on Suspension Requested By the SBA Under Arizona Supreme Court Rule 5 and the Decision Denying the Petition for Review." The State Bar filed a general response to those motions. Upon consideration,
IT IS ORDERED that the respondent's objection to the "State Bar Statement of Costs and Expenses" is DENIED. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of the State Bar in the amount of $5628.12 for its costs and expenses.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the "Petition for Review of SBA Costs Under Supreme Court Rule 23" will be treated as an objection to costs and is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the "Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order on Suspension Requested By the SBA Under Arizona Supreme Court Rule 5 and the Decision Denying the Petition for Review" is DENIED.
DATED this _____ day of March, 2009.
TO:
Patrick A Plummer, Plummer Law Office PLLC
Shauna R Miller, Bar Counsel, State Bar of Arizona
H Jeffrey Coker
Molly Dwyer, Clerk, United States Court of Appeals for Ninth Circuit
Mr. Richard H Weare, Clerk, United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Office of the Clerk (Phoenix)
Sandra Montoya, Records Manager, State Bar of Arizona
Leticia V D'Amore, Disciplinary Clerk, Disciplinary Commission, Supreme Court of Arizona
Jode Ottman, West Publishing Company, Editorial Department D3-40 #4467
Lexis Nexis, Legal Data Collection
damr