From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Platinum & Palladium Antitrust Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 15, 2020
Lead Case 1:14-cv-9391-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 15, 2020)

Opinion

Lead Case 1:14-cv-9391-GHW

04-15-2020

IN RE: PLATINUM AND PALLADIUM ANTITRUST LITIGATION


JUDGMENT

It is, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated March 29, 2020, and Memo-Endorsed Order dated April 13, 2020, Defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is granted; the Foreign Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) is denied, and Defendants' motion for reconsideration is granted; Plaintiffs are granted leave to replead their Sherman Act and CEA claims; Plaintiffs do not intend to amend their complaint and respectfully request that this Court enter final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule Civil Procedure 58, application granted, and judgment is entered for Defendants; accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

April 15, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

In re Platinum & Palladium Antitrust Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 15, 2020
Lead Case 1:14-cv-9391-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 15, 2020)
Case details for

In re Platinum & Palladium Antitrust Litig.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: PLATINUM AND PALLADIUM ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Apr 15, 2020

Citations

Lead Case 1:14-cv-9391-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 15, 2020)