From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Pinkins

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Dec 12, 2000
34 S.W.3d 244 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED 77150

December 12, 2000

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS, HONORABLE MARK D. SEIGEL

Steven Lewis, 2734 Lafayette, St. Louis, MO 63104, for appellant.

John S. Steiner, 7700 Bonhomme Avenue, Suite 400, Clayton, MO 63105, for respondent.

Before: Gary M. Gaertner, P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and George W. Draper III, J.

ORDER



Elizabeth Pinkins ("Daughter") appeals the denial of her application to be appointed conservator of the estate of her father, James Pinkins ("Father"). The trial court found that Father was incapacitated by reason of dementia and appointed the public administrator to be his conservator. On appeal, Daughter argues the court applied an improper legal standard in appointing the public administrator as conservator because it failed to give preference to her as a family member as required by section 475.050.1(3) RSMo 1994.

The trial court granted Daughter's petition to be the guardian of Father.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The judgment is supported by substantial and competent evidence in the record and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, furnished the parties with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

In re Pinkins

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Dec 12, 2000
34 S.W.3d 244 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

In re Pinkins

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JAMES PINKINS

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Dec 12, 2000

Citations

34 S.W.3d 244 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)