From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Perveen

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jan 16, 2018
No. 05-17-01410-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 16, 2018)

Opinion

No. 05-17-01410-CV

01-16-2018

IN RE NUSRAT PERVEEN, Relator


Original Proceeding from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-06933

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Schenck
Opinion by Justice Fillmore

In this original proceeding, relator complains of a final default judgment and a subsequent contempt order. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown she is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relator's petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

/Robert M. Fillmore/

ROBERT M. FILLMORE

JUSTICE 171410F.P05


Summaries of

In re Perveen

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jan 16, 2018
No. 05-17-01410-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 16, 2018)
Case details for

In re Perveen

Case Details

Full title:IN RE NUSRAT PERVEEN, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Jan 16, 2018

Citations

No. 05-17-01410-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 16, 2018)