From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Perkins

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 3, 2023
No. 23-1933 (4th Cir. Nov. 3, 2023)

Opinion

23-1933

11-03-2023

In re: VICTOR B. PERKINS, Petitioner.

Victor Bernard Perkins, Petitioner Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: September 21, 2023

On Petition for a Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. (5:23-ct-03092-M-RJ)

Victor Bernard Perkins, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM.

Victor Bernard Perkins petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his civil rights complaint. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We also deny Perkins' motion for an interlocutory judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.


Summaries of

In re Perkins

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 3, 2023
No. 23-1933 (4th Cir. Nov. 3, 2023)
Case details for

In re Perkins

Case Details

Full title:In re: VICTOR B. PERKINS, Petitioner.

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Nov 3, 2023

Citations

No. 23-1933 (4th Cir. Nov. 3, 2023)