From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Parramore

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Aug 30, 2013
NO. 03-13-00523-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 30, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 03-13-00523-CV

08-30-2013

In re Frank E. Parramore


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining that the trial court had not timely ruled on his petition for writ of habeas corpus. However, since relator filed his petition, the trial court has acted on the petition. Because relator has received a ruling on his habeas petition, which was the same relief he sought via his mandamus proceeding, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.

______________________

David Puryear, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Rose and Goodwin


Summaries of

In re Parramore

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Aug 30, 2013
NO. 03-13-00523-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 30, 2013)
Case details for

In re Parramore

Case Details

Full title:In re Frank E. Parramore

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Aug 30, 2013

Citations

NO. 03-13-00523-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 30, 2013)