From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Parker

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 17, 2018
2018-1088 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 17, 2018)

Opinion

2018-1088

07-17-2018

IN RE: NIGEL PARKER, SEPPO YLA-HERTTUALA, Appellants

J. MARK POHL, Pharmaceutical Patent Attorneys, LLC, Morristown, NJ, argued for appellants. MARY BETH WALKER, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, WILLIAM LAMARCA.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/932,202.

JUDGMENT

J. MARK POHL, Pharmaceutical Patent Attorneys, LLC, Morristown, NJ, argued for appellants. MARY BETH WALKER, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, WILLIAM LAMARCA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and LINN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 17, 2018

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Parker

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 17, 2018
2018-1088 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 17, 2018)
Case details for

In re Parker

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: NIGEL PARKER, SEPPO YLA-HERTTUALA, Appellants

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jul 17, 2018

Citations

2018-1088 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 17, 2018)