From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Padilla

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Feb 4, 2016
136 A.D.3d 1080 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

02-04-2016

In the Matter of the Claim of Luis PADILLA, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Luis Padilla, New York City, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Steven Koton of counsel), for respondent.


Luis Padilla, New York City, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Steven Koton of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 6, 2014, which dismissed claimant's appeal from a decision of the Administrative Law Judge as untimely.

By decision dated August 25, 2014, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter ALJ) affirmed an initial decision of the Department of Labor disqualifying claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that his employment was terminated due to misconduct. Claimant did not appeal the ALJ's decision to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board until October 21, 2014. The Board dismissed the appeal as untimely and claimant now appeals.

We affirm. An appeal from an ALJ's decision must be made to the Board within 20 days after the mailing of the ALJ's notice of decision (see Labor Law § 621[1] ), and the statutory time limit is strictly construed (see Matter of Stephens [Commissioner of Labor], 119 A.D.3d 1258, 1259, 989 N.Y.S.2d 409 [2014] ). The record establishes that claimant did not appeal until after the statutory time period and, significantly, offered no excuse for the delay. As such, the Board properly dismissed the appeal as untimely (see id.; Matter of Buchkin [Commissioner of Labor], 115 A.D.3d 1107, 1108, 982 N.Y.S.2d 199 [2014] ). Accordingly, the merits of the underlying determination denying claimant's request for unemployment insurance benefits are not properly before us (see Matter of Chetram [Newtek Bus. Servs.-Commissioner of Labor], 129 A.D.3d 1399, 1400, 12 N.Y.S.3d 359 [2015] ; Matter of Area Emporium LLC [Commissioner of Labor], 115 A.D.3d 1096, 1097, 982 N.Y.S.2d 404 [2014] ).

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

McCARTHY, J.P., GARRY, EGAN JR. and ROSE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Padilla

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Feb 4, 2016
136 A.D.3d 1080 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

In re Padilla

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of Luis PADILLA, Appellant. Commissioner of…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 4, 2016

Citations

136 A.D.3d 1080 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
23 N.Y.S.3d 915

Citing Cases

Page v. Comm'r of Labor

The Board dismissed the appeal as untimely, and claimant now appeals. We affirm. "Labor Law § 621 (1)…

Watts v. Comm'r Labor

Claimant did not appeal to the Board within the statutorily-prescribed time period, nor has he offered any…