From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Oxford

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
May 19, 2021
NO. 03-21-00205-CV (Tex. App. May. 19, 2021)

Opinion

NO. 03-21-00205-CV

05-19-2021

In re Bobby Oxford, Sr.


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM RUNNELS COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Bobby Oxford, Sr., an inmate in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus directed to John H. Best, the District Attorney of Runnels County, Texas. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1.

This Court does not have mandamus jurisdiction over a district attorney. See In re Smith, 03-19-00734-CV, 2019 WL 6121405, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 19, 2019, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); Roberts v. Lowry, 742 S.W.2d 747, 748 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1987, no writ). By statute, this Court has the authority to issue a writ of mandamus against "a judge of a district, statutory county, statutory probate county, or county court in the court of appeals district" and other writs as necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221. Thus, the District Attorney of Runnels County is not a party against whom we may issue a writ of mandamus unless necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. Relator has not demonstrated that our jurisdiction is implicated here. We have no jurisdiction to grant relator the relief he seeks.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

/s/_________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice Before Justices Goodwin, Triana, and Kelly Filed: May 19, 2021


Summaries of

In re Oxford

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
May 19, 2021
NO. 03-21-00205-CV (Tex. App. May. 19, 2021)
Case details for

In re Oxford

Case Details

Full title:In re Bobby Oxford, Sr.

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: May 19, 2021

Citations

NO. 03-21-00205-CV (Tex. App. May. 19, 2021)