From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Opinion of Judges

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Sep 30, 1932
14 P.2d 956 (Okla. Crim. App. 1932)

Opinion

No. A-8478.

September 30, 1932.

Opinion of the Judges of the Criminal Court of Appeals in response to a request from the Governor relative to the conviction of Joe L. Martin of the crime of murder.

To His Excellency, the Governor of the State of Oklahoma, Sir:

In response to your official communication of September 27, 1932, addressed to this court asking for an opinion as provided by section 3172, Stat. 1931, in the matter of the conviction of Joe L. Martin, for the crime of murder, in the district court of Noble county, and by judgment of said court sentenced to death by electrocution on August 24, 1932, we hereby submit the following opinion of the Judges:


The record submitted to which is attached your request for opinion discloses that defendant was charged with murder in the district court of Noble county, and on August 24, 1932, was sentenced to death. Under the Constitution and laws of this state, any person convicted of felony may appeal within six months from the time judgment is rendered. Section 3192, Stat. 1931. This time does not expire until February 24, 1933, and defendant has until and including that date to file an appeal in this court from the judgment and sentence aforesaid. It has been the uniform holding of this court that the provisions of section 3172, Stat. 1931, contemplates an advisory opinion where an appeal has not been taken from the judgment and sentence of death and where the time for appeal has expired. To render an opinion where an appeal has been taken or where the time for appeal has not expired would be to express an opinion in an ex parte proceeding as to the rights of a defendant, which may afterwards be brought before the court by appeal where all parties would be represented. An opinion in advance would deprive a defendant of his constitutional right to be heard in his own behalf. However, should such an appeal not be taken by February 24, 1933, this court will examine the record presented and render an advisory opinion as requested.

EDWARDS and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Opinion of Judges

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Sep 30, 1932
14 P.2d 956 (Okla. Crim. App. 1932)
Case details for

In re Opinion of Judges

Case Details

Full title:In re OPINION OF THE JUDGES. In re JOE L. MARTIN

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Sep 30, 1932

Citations

14 P.2d 956 (Okla. Crim. App. 1932)
14 P.2d 956

Citing Cases

Steen v. State

Subsequent thereto, the case was set for oral argument; was argued, and briefs for both the defendant and the…