In re Oliver

1 Citing case

  1. In re Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.

    56 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1007 (Tex. 2013)   Cited 140 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding the trial court abused its discretion by granting a new trial because the record did not support the articulated reason

    pending] ) (mem.op.) (denying mandamus with no additional explanation other than simply being “of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought”); In re Oliver, No. 09–11–00546–CV, 2011 WL 5594606 (Tex.App.–Beaumont Nov. 17, 2011, orig. proceeding [mand. pending] ) (mem.op.) (denying mandamus relief after concluding that relator had “not shown that the trial court's reasons provide no valid basis in th [e] case, or that the trial court clearly abused its discretion”); In re State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., No. 04–11–00708–CV, 2011 WL 4830177 (Tex.App. San Antonio Oct. 12, 2011, orig. proceeding [mand.