From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re of Stephens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 2005
15 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2003-10030.

February 22, 2005.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Suffolk County Department of Civil Service, dated May 16, 2003, which disqualified the petitioner from eligibility for the position of police officer in the County of Suffolk, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Klein, J.), dated October 8, 2003, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Before: S. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Crane and Fisher, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner applied for the position of police officer in the County of Suffolk. She provided a urine sample for drug screening in connection with her qualification tests for appointment. She tested positive for barbiturates, a controlled substance. The petitioner was disqualified from eligibility for the position by the Suffolk County Department of Civil Service. She commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review the determination disqualifying her from eligibility. The Supreme Court denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. We affirm.

The Suffolk County Department of Civil Service is afforded wide discretion in determining the fitness of candidates for appointment. "Such discretion is particularly necessary in hiring police officers, to whom higher standards of fitness and character may be applied" ( Matter of Havern v. Senko, 210 AD2d 480, 481). As long as the administrative determination is not irrational or arbitrary, this Court will not interfere with it ( see Matter of Verme v. Suffolk County Dept. of Civ. Serv., 5 AD3d 498; Matter of Havern v. Senko, supra). The petitioner's failure to pass the qualifying medical examination supports the determination of the Suffolk County Department of Civil Service ( see Matter of Verme v. Suffolk County Dept. of Civ. Serv., supra, at 499; Matter of Ressa v. County of Nassau, 224 AD2d 534).

The petitioner's claim that the respondents violated her right of appeal under the Suffolk County Department of Civil Service Rules is without merit.


Summaries of

In re of Stephens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 2005
15 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In re of Stephens

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOANNE STEPHENS, Appellant, v. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 22, 2005

Citations

15 A.D.3d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
789 N.Y.S.2d 740

Citing Cases

Rogan v. Nassau Cnty. Civil Serv. Comm'n

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. An appointing authority has wide discretion in determining…

Landon v. Kroll Lab. Specialists, Inc.

The importance attached to the results of drug tests can hardly be overstated. Indeed, the results of drug…