From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re of Computer Central v. City of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 15, 2002
296 A.D.2d 498 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-01659

Submitted April 8, 2002

July 15, 2002.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York City Department of Finance, Parking Violations Appeals Board, dated October 6, 1999, which, after a hearing, affirmed a determination of an Administrative Law Judge finding that the petitioner had violated certain provisions of the Vehicle and Traffic Law and imposing fines, the New York City Department of Finance, Parking Violations Bureau appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated October 16, 2000, which granted the petition and annulled the determination.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Larry A. Sonnenshein and Grace Goodman of counsel), for appellants.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION, ORDER JUDGMENT

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, and the judgment dated October 16, 2000, is vacated; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the determination dated October 6, 1999, is confirmed, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits; and it is further,

ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the appellants.

After disposing of the points raised by the petitioner that could have terminated the proceeding within the meaning of CPLR 7804(g), the Supreme Court should have transferred the substantial evidence question to this court for determination (see Matter of Duso v. Kralik, 216 A.D.2d 297). Nonetheless, since the record is now before us, this court will treat the issue as if it had been properly transferred here (see Matter of Casalino Interior Demolition Corp. v. State of New York Dept. of Motor Vehicle Traffic Violations Bur. Appeals Bd., 261 A.D.2d 615; Matter of Christy v. Department of Motor Vehicles, Div. of Vehicle Safety of State of N.Y., 138 A.D.2d 700; CPLR 7804[g]).

Contrary to the petitioner's contention, there is substantial evidence in the record to support the determination under review (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 240[b]; Matter of New Rochelle Ford v. Jackson, 261 A.D.2d 547; Matter of Schuster v. Babylon Union Free School Dist., 138 A.D.2d 608). Thus, the determination must be confirmed and the proceeding dismissed (see generally 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176).

RITTER, J.P., FEUERSTEIN, GOLDSTEIN and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re of Computer Central v. City of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 15, 2002
296 A.D.2d 498 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

In re of Computer Central v. City of N.Y

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF COMPUTER CENTRAL, INC., respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 15, 2002

Citations

296 A.D.2d 498 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
745 N.Y.S.2d 480

Citing Cases

Loblanco v. Hansell

ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the appellant. Since the petition raised a substantial evidence…