Opinion
2:22-mc-51450
04-27-2023
In re DIONDRE MARQUISE NORMAN, Plaintiff/Petitioner.
ANTHONY P. PATTI, MAJ. JUDGE
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 4) AND DISMISSING CASE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
GEORGE CARAM STEEH, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff/Petitioner Diondre Marquise Norman initiated an action in this Court which he titles as a “Petition for Preemptory challenge to this Presumptive Court Jurisdiction.” (ECF No. 1) This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (ECF No. 4) filed by the Magistrate Judge recommending that the petition be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c)(1), and alternatively recommending that the petition be stricken as impertinent under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f). Plaintiff/petitioner failed to file timely objections to the R&R.
This Court agrees with and adopts the thorough analysis conducted and recommendation made in support of dismissal by the magistrate judge. Now, therefore, for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge, the recommendation to dismiss the petition is adopted as an order of the Court.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 4) is adopted by the Court.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED.