From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Noah Martin Benjamin L.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 26, 2016
139 A.D.3d 593 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

05-26-2016

In re NOAH MARTIN BENJAMIN L., and Another, Dependent Children Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc., Frajon B., Respondent–Appellant, Catholic Guardian Society, Petitioner–Respondent.

Law Office of Thomas R. Villecco, P.C., Jericho (Thomas R. Villecco of counsel), for appellant. Joseph T. Gatti, New York, for respondent. Andrew J. Baer, New York, Attorney for the children.


Law Office of Thomas R. Villecco, P.C., Jericho (Thomas R. Villecco of counsel), for appellant.

Joseph T. Gatti, New York, for respondent.

Andrew J. Baer, New York, Attorney for the children.

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Karen I. Lupuloff, J.), entered on or about June 8, 2015, which denied respondent mother's motion to vacate the default judgment entered against her terminating her parental rights to the subject children upon findings of permanent neglect, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying respondent's motion to vacate her default.

Even if this Court were to determine that respondent set forth a reasonable excuse for her default in appearance, we find that the Family Court properly denied the motion to vacate, because respondent failed to set forth a meritorious defense to the petition by submitting detailed information or documentation to substantiate her claim that she completed the services required to have the children returned to her care (see Matter of Christopher James A. [Anne Elizabeth Pierre L.], 90 A.D.3d 515, 935 N.Y.S.2d 16 [1st Dept.2011], lv. dismissed 18 N.Y.3d 918, 941 N.Y.S.2d 551, 964 N.E.2d 1019 [2012] ). A preponderance of the evidence supported the determination that termination of appellant's parental rights was in the children's best interests, because the record showed that they are thriving in the foster parents' care, the foster parents want to adopt them, and respondent failed to engage in services even though the children had been in foster care since their respective births (see Matter of Shane Chayann Orion S. [Dexter F.], 79 A.D.3d 430, 431, 912 N.Y.S.2d 46 [1st Dept.2010] ).

MAZZARELLI, J.P., ANDRIAS, RICHTER, MANZANET–DANIELS, KAHN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Noah Martin Benjamin L.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 26, 2016
139 A.D.3d 593 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

In re Noah Martin Benjamin L.

Case Details

Full title:In re NOAH MARTIN BENJAMIN L., and Another, Dependent Children Under…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 26, 2016

Citations

139 A.D.3d 593 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 4090
30 N.Y.S.3d 819

Citing Cases

Yvonne H. v. Graham Windham Servs. to Families & Children (In re Paul G. D. H.)

The medical note the mother provided was dated more than a month after her default and did not support her…