From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re N.J. Tax Sales Certificates Antitrust Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Mar 10, 2016
Civil Action No. 12-1893 (MAS) (TJB) (D.N.J. Mar. 10, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-1893 (MAS) (TJB)

03-10-2016

IN RE NEW JERSEY TAX SALES CERTIFICATES ANTITRUST LITIG.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on the correspondence of counsel for Arlene Davis, Todd Zahn and Laura Zahn ("Class Objectors") seeking leave to file a motion to compel discovery on the class action settlements as to which a "Fairness Hearing" is scheduled for April 25, 2016. (ECF No. 442.) Class Counsel and Class Defendants Robert U. Del Vecchio; Isadore May; M.D. Sass Municipal Finance Partners I, L.P.; M.D. Sass Municipal Finance Partners II, L.P.; M.D. Sass Municipal Finance Partners III, LLC; M.D. Sass Municipal Finance Partners IV, LLC; M.D. Sass Municipal Finance Partners V, LLC; M.D. Sass Municipal Finance Partners VI, LLC; M.D. Sass Tax Lien Management LLC; and M.D. Sass Investor Services, Inc. opposed this request in correspondence dated March 4, 2016, March 8, 2016, and March 9, 2016. (ECF Nos. 443, 444, 445.) Pursuant to the Court's November 4, 2015 Order (ECF No. 428), "any member of the Settlement Class that does not wish to participate in the Settlement Class shall submit an exclusion request by March 14, 2016." Thus, the Class Objectors have not yet committed to remaining in the class. Until the Class Objectors have made their decision to stay in the class by not opting out and have filed an objection to settlement, the Court finds that they are not entitled to discovery. See, e.g., In re Lorazepam & Clorazepate Antitrust Litig., 205 F.R.D. 363, 366 (D.D.C. 2001) (denying discovery to "purported class members" noting that "[t]hough they claim to be 'inclined' to stay in the class, the opt-in date had not yet passed"); Lee v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, 101 F. Supp. 3d 1293, 1295 (S.D. Fla. 2015) (denying motion for discovery noting that settlement class member "failed to formally object to settlement [and] it is not yet clear if she will even remain a settlement class member, rather than opting out of the proposed settlement"). If the Class Objectors choose to opt into the settlement class, they may file objections with the Court concerning the settlement's fairness, and if necessary, the objectors may come back to this Court to seek discovery in support thereof.

Accordingly, IT IS on this 10th day of March, 2016 ORDERED that Class Objectors' request for leave to file a motion to compel discovery is denied without prejudice.

s/ Michael A. Shipp

MICHAEL A. SHIPP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

In re N.J. Tax Sales Certificates Antitrust Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Mar 10, 2016
Civil Action No. 12-1893 (MAS) (TJB) (D.N.J. Mar. 10, 2016)
Case details for

In re N.J. Tax Sales Certificates Antitrust Litig.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE NEW JERSEY TAX SALES CERTIFICATES ANTITRUST LITIG.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Mar 10, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-1893 (MAS) (TJB) (D.N.J. Mar. 10, 2016)