From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re National Store Fixture Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Aug 14, 1985
769 F.2d 1334 (8th Cir. 1985)

Opinion

No. 85-1066.

Submitted April 12, 1985.

Decided August 14, 1985.

Robert A. Pummill, Kansas City, Mo., for appellant.

Debra L. Kasper, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.

Before LAY, Chief Judge, McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge, WOODS, District Judge.

The HONORABLE HENRY WOODS, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, sitting by designation.


The bankruptcy trustee, Charles E. Rubin, appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri upholding the constitutionality of Bankruptcy Rule 5002. Rubin is a partner in the same law firm as the son of the Chief Judge of the Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Missouri. Another bankruptcy judge appointed Rubin as trustee, but the United States contends this appointment nonetheless violates rule 5002.

Rule 5002. Prohibited Appointments
No person may be appointed as a trustee or examiner or be employed as an attorney, accountant, appraiser, auctioneer, or other professional person pursuant to § 327 or § 1103 of the Code if (1) the person is a relative of any judge of the court making the appointment or approving the employment or (2) the person is or has been so connected with any judge of the court making the appointment or approving the employment as to render such appointment or employment improper. Whenever under this rule a person is ineligible for appointment or employment, the person's firm, partnership, corporation, or any other form of business association or relationship, and all members, associates and professional employees thereof are also ineligible for appointment or employment. (Superceded on July 30, 1985).

A new, superceding, rule 5002 was transmitted to Congress by the Chief Justice of the United States on April 30, 1985. Because ninety days passed without congressional action, the new rule 5002 became effective on July 30, 1985. 28 U.S.C. § 2075 (1982).

Rule 5002. Restrictions on Appointments
(a) Appointment of Relatives Prohibited. No individual may be appointed as a trustee or examiner or be employed as an attorney, accountant, appraiser, auctioneer, or other professional person pursuant to § 327 or § 1103 of the Code if the individual is a relative of the bankruptcy judge making the appointment or approving the employment. Whenever under this subdivision an individual is ineligible for appointment or employment, the individual's firm, partnership, corporation, or any other form of business association or relationship, and all members, associates and professional employees thereof are also ineligible for appointment or employment.
(b) Judicial Determination that Appointment or Employment is Improper. A bankruptcy judge may not appoint a person as a trustee or examiner or approve the employment of a person as an attorney, accountant, appraiser, auctioneer, or other professional person pursuant to § 327 or § 1103 of the Code if that person is or has been so connected with such judge as to render the appointment or employment improper.

In view of the passage of the superceding rule and the fact that Rubin's appointment does not violate the new rule, the government conceded at oral argument that, as of July 30, 1985, the present appeal becomes moot. The appeal is therefore dismissed as moot. The case is remanded with directions to vacate the orders and opinions of the district court and the bankruptcy court.


Summaries of

In re National Store Fixture Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Aug 14, 1985
769 F.2d 1334 (8th Cir. 1985)
Case details for

In re National Store Fixture Co.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE NATIONAL STORE FIXTURE COMPANY, DEBTOR. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Aug 14, 1985

Citations

769 F.2d 1334 (8th Cir. 1985)

Citing Cases

Sierra Club, Inc. v. Granite Shore Power LLC

The defendants are correct that lawsuits based on the defendant's violations of a rule have been rendered…

Sand Dollar Develop. v. Peter Michael

. . ." Bonelli v. Bonelli, supra, 214 Conn. 20, and cases cited therein; see also In re Martin-Trigona, 769…