From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re NanoInk, Inc.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 22, 2014
Case No. 13 BK 14126 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Sep. 22, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 13 BK 14126

09-22-2014

In re: NANOINK, Inc., Debtor.


Chapter 7

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION OF DEBORAH K. EBNER, ATTORNEY FOR CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE, FOR ALLOWANCE OF FINAL COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES

TOTAL FEES REQUESTED:

$171,322.00

TOTAL COSTS REQUESTED:

$1,608.14

TOTAL FEES REDUCED:

$372.00

TOTAL COSTS REDUCED:

$0.00

TOTAL FEES ALLOWED:

$170,950.00

TOTAL COSTS ALLOWED:

$1,608.14

TOTAL FEES AND COSTS ALLOWED: $172,558.14 The attached time and expense entries have been underlined to reflect disallowance in whole or in part. The basis for each disallowance is reflected by numerical notations that appear on the left of each underlined entry. The numerical notations correspond to the enumerated paragraphs below.

(1) Improper Allocation of Professional Resources

The Court denies the allowance in part of compensation for the following task since a professional with a lower level of skill and experience or a paraprofessional could have performed the task. In re Pettibone, 74 B.R. 293, 303 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1987) ("Senior partner rates will be paid only for work that warrants the attention of a senior partner. A senior partner who spends time reviewing documents or doing research a beginning associate could do will be paid at a rate of a beginning associate. [Citation omitted]. Similarly, non-legal work performed by a lawyer which could have been performed by less costly non-legal employees should command a lesser rate."); In re Wildman, 72 B.R. 700, 710 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1987) (same); In re Alberto, 121 B.R. 531, 535 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1990) (determining use of partner appropriate where attendant complex legal issues warrant highly experienced practitioner).

(13) No Benefit to the Estate

The court denies requests for fees relating to services that do not benefit the estate or that are not necessary to the administration of the case. 11 U.S.C. § 330(a)(4)(A). An attorney's internal work, prior to retention, to determine whether the attorney's firm satisfies the disinterestedness requirement of section 327 of the Bankruptcy Code does not provide benefit to the estate and is not compensable. See In re ACT Mfg., Inc., 281 B.R. 468, 490 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2002).

An attorney is required to balance the costs of performing a service and the benefit it will yield to the estate. See Matter of Taxman Clothing Co., 49 F.3d 310, 316 (7th Cir. 1995). The court denies fees for services rendered after it should have become apparent to the attorney that the services would not have yielded a net benefit for the estate. Id. Dated: September 22, 2014

/s/_________

Eugene R. Wedoff

United States Bankruptcy Judge

Image materials not available for display.


Summaries of

In re NanoInk, Inc.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 22, 2014
Case No. 13 BK 14126 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Sep. 22, 2014)
Case details for

In re NanoInk, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In re: NANOINK, Inc., Debtor.

Court:UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 22, 2014

Citations

Case No. 13 BK 14126 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Sep. 22, 2014)