Opinion
NUMBER 13-20-00317-CR
08-03-2020
IN RE ROY NANEZ JR.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER
Before Justices Hinojosa, Perkes, and Tijerina
Order Per Curiam
Relator Roy Nanez Jr., proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause through which he (1) contends that the trial court issued an order "beyond its jurisdiction," and (2) requests that we direct the trial court to honor the mandate issued by this Court in our appellate cause number 13-17-00646-CR. See Nanez v. State, No. 13-17-00646-CR, 2019 WL 961681, at *1 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Feb. 28, 2019, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (reversing and rendering a judgment of acquittal as to count two for aggravated assault and affirming as modified as to count one for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon). Some of relator's arguments concern a judgment nunc pro tunc which was allegedly entered after appellant filed his notice of appeal in that case, but before this Court issued its opinion and judgment.
The Court requests that the real party in interest, the State of Texas, acting by and through the Victoria County Criminal District Attorney, or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM Do not publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Delivered and filed the 3rd day of August, 2020.