Opinion
No. 1086 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 No. 18 DB 2004 Attorney Registration No. 21616
01-10-2013
In the Matter of JOHN FRANCIS MURPHY PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT
(Tioga County)
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 10th day of January, 2013, a Rule having been issued upon John Francis Murphy by this Court on August 22, 2012, to show cause why an order denying reinstatement should not be entered and, upon consideration of the responses filed, the Rule is discharged and the Petition for Reinstatement is hereby granted.
Pursuant to Rule 218(f), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.