In re MTD Prods.

Full title: IN RE: MTD PRODUCTS INC., Appellant

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 5, 2021

No. 2021-1474 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 5, 2021)

Opinion

2021-1474

11-05-2021

IN RE: MTD PRODUCTS INC., Appellant

John Cipolla, Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP, Cleveland, OH, argued for appellant. Also represented by Andrew Alexander, Tracy Scott Johnson, Mark McDougall; Mark T. Garrett, Norton Rose Fulbright U.S. LLP, Austin, TX. William LaMarca, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrew Hirshfeld. Also represented by Daniel Kazhdan, Thomas W. Krause, Farheena Yasmeen Rasheed, Peter John Sawert.

PER CURIAM.

This Disposition is Nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 90/013, 980.

John Cipolla, Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP, Cleveland, OH, argued for appellant. Also represented by Andrew Alexander, Tracy Scott Johnson, Mark McDougall; Mark T. Garrett, Norton Rose Fulbright U.S. LLP, Austin, TX.

William LaMarca, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrew Hirshfeld. Also represented by Daniel Kazhdan, Thomas W. Krause, Farheena Yasmeen Rasheed, Peter John Sawert.

JUDGMENT

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

PER CURIAM.

Lourie, Dyk, and Reyna, Circuit Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.