From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Moore

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Columbia
Aug 18, 2009
Case No. 09-00297 (Bankr. D.D.C. Aug. 18, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 09-00297.

August 18, 2009


MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE TRUSTEE'S MOTION TO REOPEN


Aric W. Moore has filed a letter with the court noting that the debtor may have undervalued her assets on her schedules (Dkt. No. 27). In turn, the Chapter 7 trustee has filed a motion to reopen this case, which includes a request for an order directing the debtor to appear at a continued meeting of creditors under 11 U.S.C. § 341 (Dkt. No. 28). The case has not been closed, and, accordingly, I will treat the Chapter 7 trustee's motion as seeking an order directing the clerk not to close the case based on the trustee's report of no distribution that was filed on May 26, 2009.

As to the request directing that the debtor appear at a continued meeting of creditors, the first meeting of creditors was never continued as authorized by Rule 2003(e) and has already been concluded. Once it was concluded, that triggered consequences in the case (such as a deadline for objecting to discharge that is measured from the date of the conclusion of that first meeting of creditors). It is not possible to adjourn a concluded first meeting of creditors.

But under Fed.R.Bankr.P. 2003(f), a special meeting of creditors may be called by the United States Trustee. Although the United States Trustee has not filed the instant motion, the chapter 7 trustee is authorized by that rule to request the United States Trustee to call such a meeting, and all indications are that the United States Trustee would call such a meeting to permit the chapter 7 trustee to permit an inquiry into allegations of misconduct by the debtor in this case, so I will not waste time trying to determine whether on request of a party in interest the court may direct the United States Trustee to call a special meeting of creditors.

Furthermore, under Fed.R.Bankr.P. 4002(a)(1), the debtor shall "attend and submit to an examination at the times ordered by the court." Under 11 U.S.C. § 343 the debtor must appear and submit to an examination at the meeting of creditors under § 341(a), but that means the first meeting of creditors. See In re Molitor, 395 B.R. 197, 202-203 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 2008). In contrast, there is no provision in the Bankruptcy Code or Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure automatically requiring the debtor to attend a special meeting of creditors and to submit to examination at that meeting. Instead, there must be an order or subpoena directing such attendance. Fed.R.Bankr.P. 2004(d) provides that the court may "for cause shown and on terms as it may impose order the debtor to be examined under this rule at any time or place it designates. . . ." But before such an order is entered adjudicating that cause exists, the debtor should be given an opportunity to address whether cause exists and, if cause is found to exist, the terms the order should impose, including the time and place to be designated. Alternatively, pursuant to Fed.R.Bankr.P. 2004(c), the trustee may obtain authority to issue and serve on the debtor a subpoena for the debtor to appear at the special meeting of creditors. The court's Local Bankruptcy Rule 2004-1 recognizes that authority to issue such a subpoena may be sought ex parte as the debtor will retain the right to seek to quash the subpoena or to object to the production of documents pursuant to such a subpoena. The trustee has laid out adequate grounds for the court to authorize the issuance of a subpoena.

It is thus

ORDERED that the clerk shall disregard the trustee's report of no distribution and not close this case unless and until the trustee files other papers pursuant to which the case is in a posture to be closed. It is further

ORDERED that the United States Trustee is authorized by filing a docket entry or a praecipe to call for a special meeting of creditors under Fed.R.Bankr.P. 2003(f) and to request the clerk to issue notice of that special meeting of creditors at such time and place as may be fixed in an order compelling the debtor to attend pursuant to motion of the chapter 7 trustee (or such time and place as the United States Trustee advises will be the time and place that the trustee will be employing in a subpoena to compel the debtor's attendance). It is further

ORDERED that the special meeting of creditors may be adjourned from time to time by announcement at the meeting of the adjourned date and time without further written notice. It is further

ORDERED that the request for an order directing the debtor to appear and be examined at the special meeting of creditors is denied without prejudice, but the trustee is authorized pursuant to Fed.R.Bankr.P. 2004(c) to issue and serve on the debtor a subpoena compelling the debtor to appear and testify at the special meeting of creditors. It is further

ORDERED that if the trustee wishes to obtain an order compelling the debtor to appear and testify at the special meeting of creditors, the trustee shall file a renewed motion (specifying that the trustee requests an order under Fed.R.Bankr.P. 2004(d) directing the debtor to appear and testify at the special meeting of creditors), and serve it on the debtor with notice under Local Bankruptcy Rule 9013-1 of an opportunity to oppose the motion.

The document below is hereby signed.


Summaries of

In re Moore

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Columbia
Aug 18, 2009
Case No. 09-00297 (Bankr. D.D.C. Aug. 18, 2009)
Case details for

In re Moore

Case Details

Full title:In re MARY HASTINGS MOORE, Chapter 7, Debtor

Court:United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Aug 18, 2009

Citations

Case No. 09-00297 (Bankr. D.D.C. Aug. 18, 2009)

Citing Cases

In re Ingrao

There might be merit to those decisions. But because it is the Chapter 7 Trustee who is objecting to the…