From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re: MM Marketing

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Oct 20, 2010
397 F. App'x 258 (8th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-2118.

Submitted: October 15, 2010.

Filed: October 20, 2010.

Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit.

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.


[UNPUBLISHED]


After the trustee of the bankruptcy estates of MM Marketing L.L.C. and Premier Fighting, L.L.C. employed counsel to assist him in connection with the estates, creditor Michael L. Blumenthal moved to disqualify counsel based on a conflict of interest. The bankruptcy court denied the motion but the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) reversed, and this appeal followed. Following careful review, we agree with the BAP that the trustee's attempt to justify the employment by arguing that counsel was employed for a special purpose fails: 11 U.S.C. § 327(e) governs special-purpose representation, and that statute is inapposite here, where counsel did not previously represent the debtors. We agree further that counsel held an interest adverse to the estates, because he was also serving as attorney for several creditors who held interests adverse to the estates. See In re Vote, 276 F.3d 1024, 1026 (8th Cir. 2002); United Artists Theatre Co. v. Walton, 315 F.3d 217, 225 (3d Cir. 2003). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.


Summaries of

In re: MM Marketing

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Oct 20, 2010
397 F. App'x 258 (8th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

In re: MM Marketing

Case Details

Full title:In re: MM MARKETING, L.L.C., Debtor, Michael L. Blumenthal, Appellee, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Oct 20, 2010

Citations

397 F. App'x 258 (8th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

In re Keeley & Grabanski Land P'ship

Johnston represented Thomas and Mari Grabanski, Merlyn and Dolores Grabanski, and G&K Farms in a second…