From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Mitchell

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
Feb 29, 2012
No. 08-12-00021-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 29, 2012)

Opinion

No. 08-12-00021-CR

02-29-2012

In re: HAROLD W. MITCHELL, RELATOR.


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Harold Mitchell, pro se, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, requesting that this Court compel the Honorable Bill McCoy, judge of the 358th Judicial District Court of Ector County to withdraw that part of its judgment which ordered Relator to reimburse the state for attorney's fees and costs related to his criminal conviction. Section 22.221 of the Texas Government Code expressly limits the mandamus jurisdiction of the courts of appeals to (1) a writ necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of the court, (2) a writ against a district court judge or county court judge in the court of appeals' district, or (3) a writ against a judge of a district court who is acting as a magistrate at a court of inquiry in the court of appeals district. TEX.GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a), (b)(West 2004). Because the petition for writ of mandamus is not directed against a district court judge or county court judge in our district, and issuance of the writ is not necessary to enforce our jurisdiction, we do not have jurisdiction of this original proceeding. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.

CHRISTOPHER ANTCLIFF, Justice Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Antcliff, JJ. (Do Not Publish)


Summaries of

In re Mitchell

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
Feb 29, 2012
No. 08-12-00021-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 29, 2012)
Case details for

In re Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:In re: HAROLD W. MITCHELL, RELATOR.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

Date published: Feb 29, 2012

Citations

No. 08-12-00021-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 29, 2012)