From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Minnfee

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo, Panel B
Jan 14, 2009
No. 07-08-0519-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 14, 2009)

Opinion

No. 07-08-0519-CV

Opinion issued January 14, 2009.

Opinion on Original Proceeding for Writ of Mandamus.

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.


Pending before this court is the application of Barry Dwayne Minnfee for a writ of mandamus. He requests that we compel "disclosure or discovery [of] party's right to own statement." We deny the application for the reasons that follow.

First, relator fails to state who he is wishing to mandamus. That is, nothing in the petition discloses any relevant details surrounding his discovery request or the trial court involved.

Second, rules of procedure obligate one seeking mandamus relief to accompany his petition with an appendix. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(j). The latter must include, among other things, a certified or sworn copy of the document showing the matter complained of. In this case, the document showing the matter complained of would be the motion requesting discovery of his own statement with the trial court. Minnfee failed to provide us with that motion or request.

Accordingly, the application for writ of mandamus pending before this court is denied.


Summaries of

In re Minnfee

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo, Panel B
Jan 14, 2009
No. 07-08-0519-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 14, 2009)
Case details for

In re Minnfee

Case Details

Full title:IN RE BARRY DWAYNE MINNFEE, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo, Panel B

Date published: Jan 14, 2009

Citations

No. 07-08-0519-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 14, 2009)