From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Miller

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES DIVISION
Aug 23, 2012
Case No. 2:12-bk-15622-RK (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2012)

Summary

recognizing potential to mislead creditors with "discharge at confirmation" language in plan and amending the original confirmation order to eliminate the language

Summary of this case from In re Detweiler

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-bk-15622-RK

08-23-2012

In re KYLE STEVEN MILLER and CARMEN LORRAINE MILLER, Debtors.


Chapter 11


ORDER RECONSIDERING ORDER

CONFIRMING DEBTORS' CHAPTER 11

PLAN AND MODIFYING CONFIRMED

CHAPTER 11 PLAN

The court on its own motion reconsiders and modifies its order entered on August 14, 2012, Order Confirming Debtors' Chapter 11 Plan (the "Confirmation Order"), on grounds that the Confirmation Order contains language providing for a discharge of the debtors' prepetition debts upon confirmation of the plan. This is inconsistent with 11 U.S.C. § 1141(d)(5). See Rules 9023 and 9024 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, incorporating by reference, Rules 59 and 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (authorizing alteration or amendment of judgment or new trial or relief from judgment based on mistake of law); Turner v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Co., 338 F.3d 1058, 1063 (9th Cir. 2003)(trial court has considerable discretion to alter or amend judgment to correct manifest error of law under Rule 59(e) of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure).

Section IV.A of the Second Amended Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization (Docket Entry No. 138), filed on May 16, 2012 (the "Discharge") states: "This Plan provides that upon confirmation of the Plan, Debtor shall be discharged of liability for payment of debts incurred before confirmation of the Plan, to the extent specified in 11 U.S.C. § 1141. However, the discharge will not discharge any liability imposed by the Plan."

11 U.S.C. § 1141(d)(5)(A) provides: "(5) In a case in which the debtor is an individual---(A) unless after notice and a hearing the court orders otherwise for cause, confirmation of the plan does not discharge any debt provided for in the plan until the court grants a discharge on completion of all payments under the plan; . . . ."

Arguably, the Discharge may be read to be consistent with the express terms of 11 U.S.C. § 1141, including 11 U.S.C. § 1141(d)(5), because the plan states that the debtors will be discharged "to the extent specified in 11 U.S.C. § 1141." However, the plan language states that the debtors are to be discharged upon confirmation of the plan, which is not consistent with the terms of the statute, and thus, the plan language providing for the discharge of debtors upon confirmation may be seriously misleading to the affected parties, including the debtors and creditors. See 11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(1) (Chapter 11 plan must comply with all applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C.).

Accordingly, the court on its own motion reconsiders and modifies the Confirmation Order and orders that the following language of the Discharge be deleted: "This Plan provides that upon confirmation of the Plan, Debtor shall be discharged of liability for payment of debts incurred before confirmation of the Plan, to the extent specified in 11 U.S.C. § 1141. However, the discharge will not discharge any liability imposed by the Plan." The court further orders that in place of the deleted language, the following language be added to Section IV.A of the Second Amended Plan: "Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1141(d)(5)(A), unless after notice and a hearing the court orders otherwise for cause, confirmation of the plan does not discharge any debt provided for in the plan until the court grants a discharge on completion of all payments under the plan. Alternatively, the court may grant a discharge pursuant to other provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 1141(d)(5)."

If the debtors or other parties wish to be heard with respect to this order, they may file a request for rehearing within 14 days of entry of this order and give notice of hearing to all affected parties pursuant to Local Bankruptcy Rule 9013-1.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

United States Bankruptcy Judge

NOTICE OF ENTERED ORDER AND SERVICE LIST

Notice is given by the court that a judgment or order entitled (specify) ORDER RECONSIDERING ORDER CONFIRMING DEBTORS' CHAPTER 11 PLAN AND MODIFYING CONFIRMED CHAPTER 11 PLAN was entered on the date indicated as "Entered" on the first page of this judgment or order and will be served in the manner indicated below: I. SERVED BY THE COURT VIA NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING ("NEF") Pursuant to controlling General Order(s) and Local Bankruptcy Rule(s), the foregoing document was served on the following person(s) by the court via NEF and hyperlink to the judgment or order. As of August 23, 2012, the following person(s) are currently on the Electronic Mail Notice List for this bankruptcy case or adversary proceeding to receive NEF transmission at the email address(es) indicated below:

• Michael Jay Berger michael.berger@bankruptcypower.com, jennifer.phan@bankruptcypower.com
• Howard Camhi hcamhi@ecjlaw.com
• Leslie A Cohen leslie@lesliecohenlaw.com,
jaime@lesliecohenlaw.com;Brian@lesliecohenlaw.com
• Hans F Famularo Hans.F.Famularo@irscounsel.treas.gov
• Jason E Goldstein jgoldstein@buchalter.com, bkgroup@buchalter.com;skoch@buchalter.com
• Paul H Kim Pkim@counsel.lacounty.gov
• S Blair Korschum ecfnotices@ascensioncapitalgroup.com
• Alvin Mar alvin.mar@usdoj.gov
• Christopher M McDermott ecfcacb@piteduncan.com
• Kenneth Miller kmiller@ecjlaw.com
• Faye C Rasch frasch@ecjlaw.com, lpekrul@ecjlaw.com
• Ramesh Singh claims@recoverycorp.com
• United States Trustee (SA) ustpregion16.sa.ecf@usdoj.gov
II. SERVED BY THE COURT VIA U.S. MAIL: A copy of this notice and a true copy of this judgment or order was sent by U.S. Mail, first class, postage prepaid, to the following person(s) and/or entity(ies) at the address(es) indicated below:

Debtors

Kyle Steven Miller

Carmen Lorraine Miller

2548 Ardsheal Drive

La Habra, CA 90631

Ascension Capital Group, Inc.

Capital One Auto Finance

Department

S. Blair Korschun

P.O. Box 201347

Arlington, TX 76006

Ascension Capital Group, Inc.

Attn: Capital One Auto

Finance Dept

S. Blair Korschun

P.O. Box 201347

Arlington, TX 76006

Business Partners

9301 Winnet

Chatsworth, CA 91311

Capital One Auto Finance

3901 N Dallas Pkwy

Plano, TX 75093

Capital One Auto Finance, c/o

Ascension Capital Gr

P.O. Box 201347

Arlington, TX 76006

Capital One,N.A

c/o Creditors Bankruptcy

Service

P O Box 740933

Dallas,TX 75374

Capital One,N.A

c/o Creditors Bankruptcy

Service

P O Box 740933

Dallas,Tx 75374

Centennial Bank

18837 Brookhurst St Ste

Fountain Valley, CA 92708

Chase

Po Box 15298

Wilmington, DE 19850

Chase Bank USA, N.A.

PO Box 15145

Wilmington, DE 19850-5145

Chase Mtg

Po Box 24696

Columbus, OH 43224

City of Las Vegas

Las Vegas City Attorney

400 Stewart Avenue, Ninth

Floor

Las Vegas, NV 89101

De Concini McDonald

Yetwin & Lacey, AC

2525 E Broadway

Tucson, AZ 85716

Hacienda Golf Club

718 East Road

La Habra, CA 90631

Hacienda Golf Club

Hemar, Rousso & Heald, LLP

c/o Edward S. Kim, Esq.

15910 Ventura Boulevard,

12th Floor

Encino, CA 91436

HSBC / Costco

Hsbc Retail Srvs/Attention:

Bankruptcy D

Po Box 5263

Carol Stream, IL 60197

HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A.

Bass & Associates, P.C.

3936 E. Ft. Lowell Rd., Suite

200

Tucson, AZ 85712

INTERNAL REVENUE

SERVICE

PO BOX 7346

PHILADELPHIA, PA 19101

7346

Los Angeles County

Treasurer

and Tax Collector

P.O. Box 54110

Los Angeles, CA 90054-0110

Sewer Services

Department of Finance

400 Stewart Ave

Las Vegas, NV 89101

TARGET NATIONAL BANK

C O WEINSTEIN AND

RILEY, PS

2001 WESTERN AVENUE,

STE 400

SEATTLE, WA 98121

Tnb-visa

Po Box 560284

Dallas, TX 75356

U.S. Bank, National

Association, as Trustee

c/o JPMorgan Chase Bank,

NA

Attn: OH4-7302

3415 Vision Drive

Columbus, OH 43219

Union Bank Na

PO Box 85643

San Diego, CA 92186

Union Bank Real Estate

Servicing, M-723

P.O. Box 85600

San Diego, CA 92186

Wee Wonder

7881 W Charleston St #140

Las Vegas, NV 89117

Wee Wonder

c/o Alverson Taylor

Mortenson & Sanders

7401 W Charleston Blvd

Las Vegas NV 89117
III. TO BE SERVED BY THE LODGING PARTY: Within 72 hours after receipt of a copy of this judgment or order which bears an "Entered" stamp, the party lodging the judgment or order will serve a complete copy bearing an "Entered" stamp by U.S. Mail, overnight mail, facsimile transmission or email and file a proof of service of the entered order on the following person(s) and/or entity(ies) at the address(es), facsimile transmission number(s) and/or email address(es) indicated below:


Summaries of

In re Miller

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES DIVISION
Aug 23, 2012
Case No. 2:12-bk-15622-RK (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2012)

recognizing potential to mislead creditors with "discharge at confirmation" language in plan and amending the original confirmation order to eliminate the language

Summary of this case from In re Detweiler
Case details for

In re Miller

Case Details

Full title:In re KYLE STEVEN MILLER and CARMEN LORRAINE MILLER, Debtors.

Court:UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES DIVISION

Date published: Aug 23, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2:12-bk-15622-RK (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2012)

Citing Cases

In re Detweiler

These types of provisions can be traps for unwary creditors. See In re Miller, 2012 WL 3647129 (Bankr. C.D.…