From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Miller

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 20, 1929
104 N.J. Eq. 491 (N.J. 1929)

Opinion

Decided May 20th, 1929.

On appeal from an order of the prerogative court.

Messrs. Parrot Parrot, for the appellant.

Messrs. Stamler Koestler, Mr. Hooker I. Coogeshall and G. Bartram Woodruff, for the respondent.


The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Ordinary Buchanan, and reported in 103 N.J. Eq. 86. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

In re Miller

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 20, 1929
104 N.J. Eq. 491 (N.J. 1929)
Case details for

In re Miller

Case Details

Full title:In the matter of the estate of OLIVER D. MILLER, deceased

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 20, 1929

Citations

104 N.J. Eq. 491 (N.J. 1929)
146 A. 915

Citing Cases

In re O'Mara

In re O'Mara, 101 N.J. Eq. 713. Since the petition of appeal was dismissed by the prerogative court, as…

Miller v. McCutcheon

3), was determined by a vice-ordinary exactly contrary to the decision of the vice-ordinary who disposed of…