From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Milara

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jan 30, 2020
241 N.J. 27 (N.J. 2020)

Opinion

D-121 September Term 2018 082975

01-30-2020

In the MATTER OF Diego P. MILARA, An Attorney At Law (Attorney No. 049331991)


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 18-395, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20-4(f)(default by respondent) that Diego P. Milara, formerly of Harrison, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, and who has been suspended from the practice of law since January 22 2015, should receive no additional discipline for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.5(b) (failure to communicate the basis or rate of fee in writing to client within reasonable time after commencing representation), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities);

And good cause appearing; It is ORDERED that no additional discipline be imposed for respondent's unethical conduct in DRB 18-395; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of the respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State.


Summaries of

In re Milara

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jan 30, 2020
241 N.J. 27 (N.J. 2020)
Case details for

In re Milara

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF Diego P. MILARA, An Attorney At Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Jan 30, 2020

Citations

241 N.J. 27 (N.J. 2020)
224 A.3d 614

Citing Cases

In re Young Min Kim

Although there have been unique matters where we have determined that an attorney's conduct, although…

In re Heyburn

At this point in our analysis, given respondent's protracted disciplinary history, we normally would compare…