From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Migdall

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 15, 2013
CASE NO.: SC12-1890 (Fla. Jul. 15, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO.: SC12-1890 Lower Tribunal No(s).: 2010-50,692(17H)

07-15-2013

In re: PETITION FOR DISCIPLINARY REVOCATION OF ALLAN MICHAEL MIGDALL


The uncontested petition for disciplinary revocation, as provided by Rule 3-7.12, Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, with leave to seek readmission after five years, is granted subject to the continuing jurisdiction of this Court. See Florida Bar v. Ross, 732 So. 2d 1037, 1040-42 (Fla. 1998). Disciplinary revocation is tantamount to disbarment. Florida Bar v. Hale, 762 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 2000). Petitioner is currently suspended; therefore this disciplinary revocation shall be effective nunc pro tunc to April 20, 2011.

Judgment is entered for The Florida Bar, 651 East Jefferson Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2300, for recovery of costs from Allan Michael Migdall in the amount of $5,523.39, for which sum let execution issue.

Not final until time expires to file motion for rehearing, and if filed, determined. The filing of a motion for rehearing shall not alter the effective date of this revocation. As with disbarment, in seeking readmission to The Florida Bar, petitioner "may be admitted again only upon full compliance with the rules and regulations governing admission to the bar." R. Regulating Fla. Bar 3-7.10(n). A True Copy
Test:
______________
Thomas D. Hall
Clerk, Supreme Court
kb
Served:
KENNETH LAWRENCE MARVIN
RANDI KLAYMAN LAZARUS
FRED HADDAD


Summaries of

In re Migdall

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 15, 2013
CASE NO.: SC12-1890 (Fla. Jul. 15, 2013)
Case details for

In re Migdall

Case Details

Full title:In re: PETITION FOR DISCIPLINARY REVOCATION OF ALLAN MICHAEL MIGDALL

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jul 15, 2013

Citations

CASE NO.: SC12-1890 (Fla. Jul. 15, 2013)