From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

IN RE METH HEALTHCARE SYS OF SAN ANT.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
May 25, 2005
No. 04-05-00304-CV (Tex. App. May. 25, 2005)

Opinion

No. 04-05-00304-CV

Delivered and Filed: May 25, 2005.

Original Mandamus Proceeding.

This original proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2003-CI-13193, styled Pam Hackett, et al. v. Regent Care Center of San Antonio Limited Partnership d/b/a Regent Care Center of San Antonio, et al., pending in the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Barbara Nellermoe, presiding.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied.

Sitting: Alma L. LÓPEZ, Chief Justice, Catherine STONE, Justice, Phylis J. SPEEDLIN, Justice.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


The court has considered relator's petition for writ of mandamus and motion for immediate temporary relief. The court is of the opinion that relief should be denied because an adequate remedy by appeal exists. See In re Schneider, 134 S.W.3d 866, 869-70 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2004, orig. proceeding); but see In re Woman's Hosp. of Tex., Inc., 141 S.W.3d 144, 152-53 (Tex. 2004) (Owen, J., concurring and dissenting) (stating no adequate remedy by appeal exists in cases filed prior to September 1, 2003). Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus and motion for immediate temporary relief are denied. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8(a). Relator shall pay all costs incurred in this proceeding.


Summaries of

IN RE METH HEALTHCARE SYS OF SAN ANT.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
May 25, 2005
No. 04-05-00304-CV (Tex. App. May. 25, 2005)
Case details for

IN RE METH HEALTHCARE SYS OF SAN ANT.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE METHODIST HEALTHCARE SYSTEM OF SAN ANTONIO, LTD., L.L.P., INC. D/B/A…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: May 25, 2005

Citations

No. 04-05-00304-CV (Tex. App. May. 25, 2005)

Citing Cases

In re McAllen Medical Center, Inc.

We now hold that mandamus relief is available when the purposes of the health care statute would otherwise be…

In re McAllen Medical

We now hold that mandamus relief is available when the purposes of the health care statute would otherwise be…