From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Mendicino

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jul 29, 2022
No. 05-22-00708-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 29, 2022)

Opinion

05-22-00708-CV

07-29-2022

IN RE SAMUEL MENDICINO, TRUSTEE OF THE CHRISTOPHER J. MERLO IRREVOCABLE LIFE INSURANCE TRUST, AND CHARLES STANLEY CHURCHWELL, JR., CO-TRUSTEE OF THE CHRISTOPHER J. MERLO REVOCABLE TRUST, Relators


Original Proceeding from the Probate Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR-18-03799-2

Before Justices Molberg, Pedersen, III, and Garcia

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DENNISE GARCIA, JUSTICE

Relators Samuel Mendicino, Trustee of the Christopher J. Merlo Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust, and Charles Stanley Churchwell, Jr., Co-Trustee of the Christopher J. Merlo Revocable Trust, filed a petition asking this Court to vacate (1) an Order Appointing Guardian ad Litem, (2) an Order Denying the Motion to Set Aside Order Appointing ad Litem and Amended Order Appointing Guardian ad Litem and Expanding Powers, and (3) an Order Granting Motion to Compel Statutory Accounting. Also before the Court is relators' motion for temporary relief.

As the parties seeking relief, relators bear the burden to provide the Court with a sufficient record to establish their right to relief. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). A relator establishes its right to relief by showing that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that the relator lacks an appellate remedy. In re The Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

Relators must provide this Court with a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to establishing their right to mandamus relief and that was filed in the underlying proceeding. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A), 52.7(a)(1); In re Butler, 270 S.W.3d 757, 759 (Tex. App.-Dallas 2008, orig. proceeding). Because documents included in the relators' appendix are not certified by a trial court clerk or adequately sworn copies, we conclude relators have not met their burden.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We also deny the motion for temporary relief as moot.


Summaries of

In re Mendicino

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jul 29, 2022
No. 05-22-00708-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 29, 2022)
Case details for

In re Mendicino

Case Details

Full title:IN RE SAMUEL MENDICINO, TRUSTEE OF THE CHRISTOPHER J. MERLO IRREVOCABLE…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Jul 29, 2022

Citations

No. 05-22-00708-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 29, 2022)