In re Medina

Full title: IN RE REGINALD MEDINA

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg

Date published: Aug 28, 2009

No. 13-09-00464-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 28, 2009)

Opinion

No. 13-09-00464-CR

Opinion delivered and filed August 28, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Before Justices RODRIGUEZ, GARZA, and VELA.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Memorandum Opinion PER CURIAM.[fn1] [fn1] See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

Relator, Reginald Medina, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on August 13, 2009, through which he complains that the trial court erred in refusing to issue a nunc pro tunc judgment reflecting the time credit to which relator is allegedly entitled. The Court requested and received a response from the real party in interest, the State of Texas, acting by and through the Criminal District Attorney of Nueces County, Texas. The real party in interest has now filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this petition for writ of mandamus. According to the motion, the matters in this original proceeding have been resolved and this proceeding has been rendered moot. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and the unopposed motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the parties are entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the petition for writ of mandamus is DISMISSED AS MOOT without reference to the merits thereof.