From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re McMillan v. the City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 9, 2001
279 A.D.2d 280 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

January 9, 2001.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered October 1, 1999, which, insofar as appealed from, granted petitioner infant's application to serve a late notice of claim alleging respondents' malpractice in rendering prenatal care to her mother and neonatal care to herself, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Sullivan, P.J., Williams, Tom, Saxe, Friedman, JJ.

Edward T. Cooper, for petitioner-respondent.

Jane L. Gordon, for respondents-appellants.


The infant, who claims that her brain damage, cerebral palsy and spastic quadriplegia were caused by respondents' malpractice, should not be penalized for the two-year delay of her mother in seeking legal counsel and the ensuing five-year delay caused by counsel's law-office failure, where respondents have been in possession of her medical records since the time of the alleged malpractice, and, accordingly, have not been prejudiced by the delay (see, Spaulding v. New York City Health Hosps. Corp., 210 A.D.2d 128, citing Matter of Williams v. Bronx Mun. Hosp. Center, 205 A.D.2d 420; Cruz v. City of New York, 200 A.D.2d 407, 408; see also, Matter of Kurz v. New York City Health Hosps. Corp., 174 A.D.2d 671). Respondents' claim of prejudice by reason of two of the doctors accused of malpractice having left their employ is unconvincing absent a showing that the doctors are actually unavailable.


Summaries of

In re McMillan v. the City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 9, 2001
279 A.D.2d 280 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

In re McMillan v. the City of New York

Case Details

Full title:IN RE PETITION OF MARY McMILLAN, ETC., PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, MARY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 9, 2001

Citations

279 A.D.2d 280 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
718 N.Y.S.2d 819

Citing Cases

Pearson v. N.Y.C. Health Hosp. Corp.

The First Department has repeatedly held that a defendant's possession of medical records can be sufficient…

Moody v. New York City Health Hosp. Corp.

The First Department, like the Second Department, has repeatedly held that medical records are sufficient to…