In re M.C.M

2 Citing cases

  1. In re E.G

    231 P.3d 785 (Okla. Civ. App. 2010)   Cited 4 times

    While the State bears the burden of proof by clear and convincing evidence of the elements for termination of parental rights, once they are shown, the burden shifts to the parent to demonstrate the conditions which led to the deprived adjudication have been corrected. In re M.C.M., 2008 OK CIV APP 29, ¶ 11, 180 P.3d 688, 690. In reviewing a termination order, the appellate court must canvass the record to determine whether the factual findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence.

  2. In re J.D.D

    241 P.3d 691 (Okla. Civ. App. 2010)   Cited 1 times

    In a parental rights termination proceeding, the court shall not terminate the rights of a parent unless one or more of the statutory grounds for termination of parental rights at 10A O.S. Supp. 2009 § 1-4-904[ 10A-1-4-904] has been proven by "clear and convincing" evidence. In re M.C.M., 2008 OK CIV APP 29, ¶ 11, 180 P.3d 688, 690. On appeal, we review to determine whether the trial court's judgment is supported by the requisite clear and convincing evidence.