From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Martz

United States District Court, District of Alaska
Feb 21, 2023
3:20-cv-00152-SLG (D. Alaska Feb. 21, 2023)

Opinion

3:20-cv-00152-SLG

02-21-2023

In the Matter of the COMPLAINT of William and Jane Martz, as owners of the Nautique, for Limitation of Liability.


ORDER RE MOTION TO STAY SUBPOENAS

SHARON L. GLEASON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court at Docket 90 is the Alaska Department of Public Safety's (DPS) Motion to Stay Subpoenas. Mr. Horazdovsky filed a response in support of the motion at Docket 94 and William and Jane Martz filed a response in opposition to the motion at Docket 101.

The State seeks to stay the depositions of six law enforcement officers until after the criminal trial of Reagan Martz is concluded. The State's motion is denied, as it has not demonstrated it would be substantially prejudiced and deprived of a fair trial in the state criminal case if the proposed depositions of the law enforcement officers take place at this time. Keating v. Off. of Thrift Supervision, 45 F.3d 322, 324 (9th Cir. 1995).

A search on Courtview indicates that the criminal trial has been continued once again; it is now set for late April 2023.


Summaries of

In re Martz

United States District Court, District of Alaska
Feb 21, 2023
3:20-cv-00152-SLG (D. Alaska Feb. 21, 2023)
Case details for

In re Martz

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the COMPLAINT of William and Jane Martz, as owners of the…

Court:United States District Court, District of Alaska

Date published: Feb 21, 2023

Citations

3:20-cv-00152-SLG (D. Alaska Feb. 21, 2023)